We're on an Apollo 13 mission: Gen Kranz the Flight Director at the time said,"When bad things happen, we just calmly laid out all the options and failure was not one of them". Tough and competent, "we are forever accountable for what we do or fail to do. We will never take anything for granted. We will never fall short of our knowledge or our skills".
Showing posts with label War Crimes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label War Crimes. Show all posts
Sunday, July 7, 2013
The World is Boiling Over
Wow, mama looks like the whole world has it in for the U.S. and this will force a hand sooner than expected. When under pressure you make mistakes certainty when it offsets one's clockwork. War crimes and NSA surveillance have upset the entire world in which we live, you have nations rising against nations, nobody at this point seems to really have allies in which you can trust, kind of like Spy vs Spy.
Not only is the planet changing but humanity right along with it. Now's not the time to be alarmed but to be grateful any of this is getting out and growing like super vegetative growth, I use that term for if you look around just in your own backyard ( well at lease here in the Midwest) the plant life is huge this year. The planet will take care of herself, with the carbon levels being high the planet is producing more plant life, without the help of humans, even in sparse areas on the planet growth is starting and here comes the oxygen along with it. I mean really, where did you think the help was going to come from? Just say thank you Earth.
But for the ones who think their in control of your destination the outcrop of info is off the charts and upsetting many agendas. The United States has been used as a warmonger far too long, it's not the people or the government but the ones with money who get their way and get to use the best of the best which is created by people and tax dollars. Russia and China have had enough of this play, can't blame the people of a country that are manipulated by money from an interest that don't care about you but only for gain. So the next war should be a small one, let's say 1% of the world's population, get my drift! Game over Boy's for your allies are dropping like bugs to a zapper!
Life is going to be better and thanks for screwing up you idiots', we're going to be happy damn it!
FisherOfPeople
Also
Along with exposing widespread international surveillance, Edward Snowden has revealed how exactly the US is financing its military ambitions, according to Max Keiser.
I want you to think about something, many have said American's are not doing anything to stop it's government, well once again this goes beyond government, had to figure that part of it first and who's letting the cat out of the bag? That's right Pod the American people, we're more pissed off with this than you are, believe me! So no need to nuke us, we're working on it!
GrimghostMediaArabic
Labels:
Allies,
Bush,
China,
NSA,
Obama,
Russia,
Spy vs Spy,
surveillance,
United States,
War Crimes
Wednesday, May 1, 2013
War Crimes
Don't want to be talking out my butt hole, need facts!
From Wikipedia: ex-Senator and former US presidential candidate Mike Gravel and Daniel Ellsberg
The Pentagon Papers were a large collection (4100 pages) of secret government documents and studies pertaining to the Vietnam War, of which former Defense Department analyst Daniel Ellsberg had made unauthorized copies and was determined to make public. Ellsberg had for a year and a half approached members of Congress – such as William Fulbright, George McGovern, Charles Mathias, and Pete McCloskey – about publishing the documents, on the grounds that the Speech or Debate Clause of the Constitution would give congressional members immunity from prosecution, but all had refused. Instead, Ellsberg gave the documents to the Times.
The U.S. Justice Department immediately tried to halt publication, on the grounds that the information revealed in the papers harmed the national interest. Within the next two weeks, a federal court injunction halted publication in The Times; The Washington Post and several other newspapers began publishing parts of the documents, with some of them also being halted by injunctions; and the whole matter went to the U.S. Supreme Court for arguments. Looking for an alternate publication mechanism, Ellsberg returned to his idea of having a member of Congress read them, and chose Gravel based on the latter's efforts against the draft; Gravel agreed where previously others had not. Ellsberg arranged for the papers to be given to Gravel on June 26, 1971, via an intermediary, Washington Post editor Ben Bagdikian. Gravel used his counter-intelligence experience to choose a midnight transfer in front of the Mayflower Hotel in the center of Washington.
On the night of June 29, 1971, Gravel attempted to read the papers on the floor of the Senate as part of his filibuster against the draft but was thwarted when no quorum could be formed. Gravel instead convened a session of the Buildings and Grounds subcommittee that he chaired. He got New York Congressman John Dow to testify that the war had soaked up funding for public buildings, thus making discussion of the war relevant to the committee. He began reading the papers with the press in attendance, omitting supporting documents that he felt might compromise national security, and declaring, "It is my constitutional obligation to protect the security of the people by fostering the free flow of information absolutely essential to their democratic decision-making."
He read until 1 a.m., until with tears and sobs he said that he could no longer physically continue, the previous three nights of sleeplessness and fear about the future having taken their toll. Gravel ended the session by, with no other senators present, establishing unanimous consent to insert 4,100 pages of the Papers into the Congressional Record of his subcommittee. The following day, the Supreme Court's New York Times Co. v. United States decision ruled in favor of the newspapers and publication in The Times and others resumed. In July 1971, Bantam Books published an inexpensive paperback edition of the papers containing the material The Times had published.
RussiaToday
Bush and Blair
In November 2011, the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal, in which Francis Boyle, a professor of international law at the University of Illinois, led the prosecution team, convicted Bush and Blair of crimes against peace and humanity, and genocide over their roles in the Iraq war.
On May 11, 2012, the tribunal also found Bush, former US Vice President Dick Cheney and former US Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld guilty of the crime of torture.
According to Principles of the Nuremberg Tribunal, planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances are crimes "punishable" under international law.
"We will keep after Bush and Blair for sure for crimes against peace, war crimes and torture in general," Boyle told Press TV in a recent interview. "The wheels of justice might turn slowly, but they do turn." "We are making efforts now to do this," Boyle stated, adding, "We tried to get Bush in Switzerland, but his lawyers advised him not to go to Switzerland. I tried three times to get Bush in Canada, but unfortunately, the Canadian government protected Bush."
KevinLancasterify
Tony Blair Publicly humiliated by Reg Keys
On November 2011, a mock war-crimes tribunal put together by the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission reached a unanimous conclusion that Tony Blair and George W. Bush are guilty of crimes against peace, crimes against humanity, and genocide as a result of their roles in the 2003 Iraq War. The mock trial, which lasted 4 days, consisting of 5 judges of judicial and academic backgrounds, a court-appointed defense team in lieu of the defendants or representatives, and a prosecution team including international law professor Francis Boyle. The mock tribunal's finding received mixed responses, being labeled a "circus" by former UN Special Rapporteur Param Cumaraswamy.
In September 2012, Bishop Desmond Tutu suggested that Blair should follow the path of former African leaders who had been brought before the International Criminal Court in the Hague. The human rights lawyer Geoffrey Bindman, interviewed on BBC radio, concurred with Tutu's suggestion that there should be a war crimes trial. In a statement made in response to Tutu's comments, Blair defended his actions. He was supported by Lord Falconer, who stated that the war had been properly authorized by United Nations Security Council Resolution 1441.
People attempting a peaceful citizen’s arrest of the former British prime minister,
Tony Blair
History of War Crimes
cip1883
IMUS on War Crime
This was back in Feb 2007 when IMUS was with MSNBC, he goes after the liberals. Imus was fired in 2007 for saying "nappy-headed hoes" referring to the Rutgers University women's basketball team. Now think about this, with all that goes on in the political arena and the failure of the banks you get hung for saying something that might hurt someone's feelings. You now something liberals are pussies, now let me help the ones who's feelings just got hurt. We keep ignoring the way our society is headed by allowing money to run the government that allows our military to perform dirty deeds for dirt cheap, it won't be long until many other countries are going to turn on the USA. Ah, this is already happening.
imusblog
From Wikipedia: ex-Senator and former US presidential candidate Mike Gravel and Daniel Ellsberg
The Pentagon Papers were a large collection (4100 pages) of secret government documents and studies pertaining to the Vietnam War, of which former Defense Department analyst Daniel Ellsberg had made unauthorized copies and was determined to make public. Ellsberg had for a year and a half approached members of Congress – such as William Fulbright, George McGovern, Charles Mathias, and Pete McCloskey – about publishing the documents, on the grounds that the Speech or Debate Clause of the Constitution would give congressional members immunity from prosecution, but all had refused. Instead, Ellsberg gave the documents to the Times.
The U.S. Justice Department immediately tried to halt publication, on the grounds that the information revealed in the papers harmed the national interest. Within the next two weeks, a federal court injunction halted publication in The Times; The Washington Post and several other newspapers began publishing parts of the documents, with some of them also being halted by injunctions; and the whole matter went to the U.S. Supreme Court for arguments. Looking for an alternate publication mechanism, Ellsberg returned to his idea of having a member of Congress read them, and chose Gravel based on the latter's efforts against the draft; Gravel agreed where previously others had not. Ellsberg arranged for the papers to be given to Gravel on June 26, 1971, via an intermediary, Washington Post editor Ben Bagdikian. Gravel used his counter-intelligence experience to choose a midnight transfer in front of the Mayflower Hotel in the center of Washington.
On the night of June 29, 1971, Gravel attempted to read the papers on the floor of the Senate as part of his filibuster against the draft but was thwarted when no quorum could be formed. Gravel instead convened a session of the Buildings and Grounds subcommittee that he chaired. He got New York Congressman John Dow to testify that the war had soaked up funding for public buildings, thus making discussion of the war relevant to the committee. He began reading the papers with the press in attendance, omitting supporting documents that he felt might compromise national security, and declaring, "It is my constitutional obligation to protect the security of the people by fostering the free flow of information absolutely essential to their democratic decision-making."
He read until 1 a.m., until with tears and sobs he said that he could no longer physically continue, the previous three nights of sleeplessness and fear about the future having taken their toll. Gravel ended the session by, with no other senators present, establishing unanimous consent to insert 4,100 pages of the Papers into the Congressional Record of his subcommittee. The following day, the Supreme Court's New York Times Co. v. United States decision ruled in favor of the newspapers and publication in The Times and others resumed. In July 1971, Bantam Books published an inexpensive paperback edition of the papers containing the material The Times had published.
RussiaToday
Bush and Blair
In November 2011, the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal, in which Francis Boyle, a professor of international law at the University of Illinois, led the prosecution team, convicted Bush and Blair of crimes against peace and humanity, and genocide over their roles in the Iraq war.
On May 11, 2012, the tribunal also found Bush, former US Vice President Dick Cheney and former US Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld guilty of the crime of torture.
According to Principles of the Nuremberg Tribunal, planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances are crimes "punishable" under international law.
"We will keep after Bush and Blair for sure for crimes against peace, war crimes and torture in general," Boyle told Press TV in a recent interview. "The wheels of justice might turn slowly, but they do turn." "We are making efforts now to do this," Boyle stated, adding, "We tried to get Bush in Switzerland, but his lawyers advised him not to go to Switzerland. I tried three times to get Bush in Canada, but unfortunately, the Canadian government protected Bush."
KevinLancasterify
Tony Blair Publicly humiliated by Reg Keys
On November 2011, a mock war-crimes tribunal put together by the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission reached a unanimous conclusion that Tony Blair and George W. Bush are guilty of crimes against peace, crimes against humanity, and genocide as a result of their roles in the 2003 Iraq War. The mock trial, which lasted 4 days, consisting of 5 judges of judicial and academic backgrounds, a court-appointed defense team in lieu of the defendants or representatives, and a prosecution team including international law professor Francis Boyle. The mock tribunal's finding received mixed responses, being labeled a "circus" by former UN Special Rapporteur Param Cumaraswamy.
In September 2012, Bishop Desmond Tutu suggested that Blair should follow the path of former African leaders who had been brought before the International Criminal Court in the Hague. The human rights lawyer Geoffrey Bindman, interviewed on BBC radio, concurred with Tutu's suggestion that there should be a war crimes trial. In a statement made in response to Tutu's comments, Blair defended his actions. He was supported by Lord Falconer, who stated that the war had been properly authorized by United Nations Security Council Resolution 1441.
People attempting a peaceful citizen’s arrest of the former British prime minister,
Tony Blair
History of War Crimes
cip1883
IMUS on War Crime
This was back in Feb 2007 when IMUS was with MSNBC, he goes after the liberals. Imus was fired in 2007 for saying "nappy-headed hoes" referring to the Rutgers University women's basketball team. Now think about this, with all that goes on in the political arena and the failure of the banks you get hung for saying something that might hurt someone's feelings. You now something liberals are pussies, now let me help the ones who's feelings just got hurt. We keep ignoring the way our society is headed by allowing money to run the government that allows our military to perform dirty deeds for dirt cheap, it won't be long until many other countries are going to turn on the USA. Ah, this is already happening.
imusblog
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


